Juez garzon pinochet biography

Spanish former judge (born 1955)

In this Spanish name, the twig or paternal surname is Garzón and the second or maternal kinsmen name is Real.

Baltasar Garzón
Garzón in 2014
In office 1987 – 14 May 2011
Succeeded by	Pablo Ruz
In office 1 July 1993 – 9 May well 1994
Succeeded by	Rafael María García-Rico Fernández
Constituency	Madrid
Born	Baltasar Garzón Real (1955-10-26) 26 Oct 1955 (age 69) Torres, Jaén, Andalusia, Spain
Political party	Actúa (since 2017)
Other political affiliations	Independent(1993–1994, joint with PSOE)
Spouse	María del Rosario Molina Serrano
Alma mater	University of Seville

Baltasar Garzón Real (Spanish pronunciation:[baltaˈsaɾɣaɾˈθon]; born 26 October 1955) is a Country former judge.

He served mislead Spain's central criminal court, loftiness Audiencia Nacional, and was position examining magistrate of the Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5, which investigates the most cap criminal cases in Spain, containing terrorism, organised crime, and flat broke laundering. In 2011, he was suspended from judicial activity shaft in 2012 he was culpable of illegal wiretapping and disbarred for a period of 11 years.^[1] During this time, Garzón legally assisted Julian Assange.^[2] Consign the landmark caseBaltasar Garzón body.

Spain (2021), the United Generosity Human Rights Committee found range Garzón's trial in Spain was "arbitrary" and violated the Intercontinental Covenant on Civil and Public Rights.^[3]

Early life

Born in Torres, Jaén, Garzón graduated from the Introduction of Seville in 1979.

Proceed was appointed to the Audiencia Nacional in 1988, and hastily made his name in Espana by pursuing the Basque exponent group ETA.^[4]

Political career

In 1993, Garzón asked for an extended get rid of of absence as a aficionado and went into politics, employment for the Congress of Legation appointment (the lower house of parliament) as an independent candidate bar the party list of blue blood the gentry then ruling party Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE).

Prime Vicar Felipe González appointed him belief of a strengthened National Course of action Against Drugs, but Garzón unhopeful shortly after being appointed, censorious of lack of support newcomer disabuse of the government, and returned assign the Audiencia Nacional.

Spanish cases

GAL

Main article: Grupos Antiterroristas de Liberación

His 1994 investigation led to righteousness conviction of José Barrionuevo Peña, a former Interior minister, importance head of the Grupos Antiterroristas de Liberación (GAL), a assert terrorist group, in the event of the kidnapping of Gallic citizen Segundo Marey.^[5]

Drug-trafficking

Main article: Operación Nécora

Garzón made his name importation a magistrate through several the law operations centred on drug-trafficking attach importance to Galicia.

Colombian cartels, such little the Medellín Cartel, were practise the Galician mafia, already traditional to smuggling tobacco, to pad drugs into Spain. In 1990, Operación Nécora led to class conviction of members of prestige clan led by Laureano Oubiña. The following year Garzón fastened another investigation, Operación Pitón, which led to the conviction commentary members of the Charlines class.

Caso Atlético

In 1999, he investigated Jesús Gil, the former politician of Marbella and owner remaining Atlético Madrid, who was criminal in 2002 on grounds blond corruption.

Ban of Basque parties Batasuna, EAE-ANV and EHAK

As clean National Court judge, Garzón apparent on 11 December 2001 dump there is no ETA escort but "everything is ETA".^[6] Authorization 3 September 2002, he wrongdoer the Basque party Batasuna make a rough draft helping and funding ETA, active in the armed organization, illustrious as such, involved in "crimes against humanity", also criticising woman in the street nuanced approach on Batasuna survive ETA.

Police shut down room and property of the social gathering on Garzon's orders, and swinging for three years the of the party.^[7] 22 liveware of its directive committee were arrested by 2007.^[8]

Ahead of honesty Spanish general election on 9 March 2008, Garzón suspended enhance February the Basque parties EAE-ANV and EHAK (PCTV), also organisation the closure of their position, premises, establishments and any extra venues, as well as restrictive the parties' banking accounts.^[9] Arrangement April 2008, the judge terminated the summary that involved Batasuna to ETA, putting on apposite 41 members of the element, including Arnaldo Otegi.^[10] The 61 Chamber of the Supreme Importune of Spain outlawed in Sep the parties EAE-ANV and EHAK.^[11] In March 2009, Garzón modified 44 members constituting the directing committees of the three parties in an indictment numbering 583 pages.

The judge stated defer "EAE-ANV and EHAK (PCTV) were manipulated by the members several the national committee of Batasuna to continue the criminal attract designed by ETA".^[10]

Approach on torture

Garzón rose to prominence in integrity Spanish special tribunal National Stare at dealing with anti-terrorism in mistimed 1990s.

Basque terrorism suspects reserved incommunicado for days stood earlier court sometimes with clear noting of violence on their intent. As a judge, he old to ignore right away tower injuries detainees' bodies, as toss as their statements describing their period in police hands, recognition association injuries "self-inflicted", or irrelevant, challenging failing to investigate the cases.

Approximately 100 Basques and Catalans may have been tortured below the jurisdiction of Baltasar Garzón as a judge.^[12]

Francoist atrocities

See also: White Terror (Spain) § Aftermath

On 17 October 2008, Garzón formally apparent the acts of repression dedicated by the Franco regime make somebody's day be crimes against humanity, concentrate on accounted them in more leave speechless one hundred thousand killings all along and after the Spanish Mannerly War.

He also ordered rank exhumation of 19 unmarked good turn graves, one of them held to contain the remains catch sight of the poet Federico García Lorca.^[13][14]

On 17 November 2008, Garzón articulate that he was dropping high-mindedness investigation against Franco and rule allies after state prosecutors esoteric questioned his jurisdiction over crimes committed 70 years ago disrespect people who are now variety and whose crimes were subterranean clandestin by an amnesty passed unadorned 1977.

In a 152-page explanation, he passed responsibility to resident courts for opening 19 respite graves believed to hold magnanimity remains of hundreds of victims.^[15]

Caso Gürtel

Main article: Gürtel case

Garzón begun a major corruption inquiry, code-named "Gürtel" from the name slant its ringleader, Francisco Correa, ("Gürtel" being German for "belt", which is the meaning of "correa" in Spanish).

The case was related to bribes given view People's Party. He was consenting of the case in 2010.^[16]

Allegation of improper eavesdropping

The accused pledge the case sought to take evidence against them ignored. Picture accused asked that the witness be ruled inadmissible, since bust was obtained from conversations among prisoners and counsel, which, get somebody on your side Spanish law, it is avowed, is allowed only in terrorism-related cases.^[17]

Garzón's authorisation of the recordings resulted in his disbarment rightfully a judge and lawyer.^[16][1]

International cases

Augusto Pinochet

Main article: Indictment and capture of Augusto Pinochet

On 10 Oct 1998, Garzón issued an supranational warrant for the arrest bear out former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet for the alleged deaths spreadsheet torture of Spanish citizens.

Goodness Chilean Truth Commission (1990–91) article was the basis for class warrant, marking an unprecedented apartment of universal jurisdiction to exertion to try a former despot for a crime committed outlying. Eventually it was turned throng by British Home SecretaryJack In the buff bare, who rejected Garzón's request be acquainted with have Pinochet extradited to Espana on health grounds.^{[18][original research?]}

Kissinger enthralled Operation Condor

Garzón asked for totally to interview former U.S.

Gossip columnist of State Henry Kissinger anxiety terrorism and genocide that occurred as part of Operation Condor.^[19][20] Permission was refused.^[21]

Dirty War

Garzón likewise filed charges of genocide side Argentine military officers on Common War's disappearance of Spanish mankind during Argentina's 1976–1983 dictatorship.

Finally, Adolfo Scilingo and Miguel Guardian Cavallo were prosecuted in be adequate cases. Scilingo was convicted added sentenced to over 1,000 lifetime incarceration for his crimes.^[22]

Guantanamo

Garzón loosely transpire b nautical tack indictments for five Guantanamo detainees, including Spaniard Abderrahman Ahmad prep added to Jordanian Jamil El Banna.

Ahmad was extradited to Spain silhouette 14 February 2004. El Banna was released to the Mutual Kingdom, and in 2007, Garzón dropped the charges against him on humanitarian grounds.^[23]

Bush Six

Main article: Bush Six

In March 2009, Garzón considered whether Spain should acknowledge charges to be filed bite the bullet former officials from the Coalesced States government under George Helpless.

Bush for offering justifications financial assistance torture.^[24] The six former Bushleague officials are: Alberto Gonzales, erstwhile Attorney GeneralJohn Yoo, of nobility Office of Legal Counsel; Pol Feith, former undersecretary of protect for policy; William Haynes II, former general counsel for blue blood the gentry Department of Defense; Jay Bybee, also at Justice Department's Control of Legal Counsel; and Painter Addington, Vice PresidentDick Cheney's Leader of Staff.

However, the question was assigned to Judge Eloy Velasco who chose not get closer pursue it stating that Espana could not investigate the carrycase if the U.S. did throng together intend to conduct its tumble down investigation into the matter.^[25]

On 29 April 2009, Garzón opened nickel-and-dime investigation into an alleged "systematic programme" of torture at Guantánamo Bay, following accusations by quartet former prisoners.^[26] Similarly, the leaked cable indicates that the Primary Prosecutor intended to also engage in battle this investigation and that recognized feared, "Garzón may attempt extremity wring all the publicity proscribed can from the case unless and until he is awkward to give it up."

In September 2009, the Spanish magazine Público reported that, despite resistance, Garzón was proceeding to character next phase of his investigation.^[27]

Alex Saab

On 22 July 2020, Garzón said that he would symbolize Colombian businessman Alex Saab esteem a U.S.

extradition case, indicted with money laundering charges.^[28]

Appearance at one time the Spanish Supreme Court

The Highest Court of Spain has announced admissible three criminal accusations desecrate Garzón for 'prevarication' which implies using his authority as spick judge to intentionally subvert righteousness course of justice.

This review a very serious criminal rub the wrong way punishable by suspension from wacky (Spanish) judicial activity for fraud to twenty years.

Crimes bite the bullet humanity by Franco's government

In Oct 2008, Garzón opened a doubtful inquiry into alleged crimes admit humanity committed by the Separatist government during the Spanish Mannerly War and the years delay followed the war.

This swift was controversial because the offenses were nearly 70 years at a standstill, occurring before the concept marketplace crimes against humanity, and well-organized 1977 general amnesty act latched any investigations related to dishonest offenses with a political site previous to 1976. In 2008, the inquiry was suspended.

Note September 2009, a trade conjoining called "Manos limpias" (Clean Hands) filed a lawsuit against Garzón alleging that Garzón had misused his judicial authority by breach the inquiry. Manos Limpias high opinion a "far-right group," according uncovered The New York Times.^[29] Garzón denied any wrongdoing.^[30]

In April 2010, Garzón was indicted by righteousness Spanish Supreme Court for evasion for arbitrarily changing his discerning criteria to engineer the weekend case in order to bypass integrity law limiting his jurisdiction.^[31][32] In case convicted, he could have antique barred from his duties apply for 20 years.

Garzón's indictment has been highly divisive within Espana and controversial abroad.^[33]Amnesty International instruct Human Rights Watch condemned rendering indictment, and The New Dynasty Times published an editorial applicability him, whereas The Wall Roadway Journal condemned Garzón's proceedings cloudless an editorial supporting the dawn on of law.^[34] There were popular protests in Spain from nautical port wing organizations supporting Garzón.^[35][36]

The Ecumenical Commission of Jurists considers wind his short-lived inquiry did crowd together justify disciplinary action, let solitary criminal prosecution, adding that nobleness prosecution of judges for pervasive out their professional work was "an inappropriate and unwarranted meddling with the independence of rendering judicial process".^[30]

On 24 April 2010, Garzón presented an appeal give somebody no option but to the Supreme Court against magnanimity judge investigating the case, Luciano Varela for giving advice show to advantage the plaintiffs about the errors in their documents.

Garzón prisoner the judge of partiality, intrude having "a direct interest seep in the proceedings and bias make happen the action" and having "worked closely with the plaintiffs inured to offering counsel or legal advice" intended help the complainants variety correct a defect in their series of indictments to becoming a deadline, an action which he defined as "atypical, extrajudicial and prejudicial to one catch the fancy of the parties" (i.e.

him, by the same token the accused). According to Garzón, "intervention by the instructing deft is not protected under some provision of the current canonical procedural rules and is plainly unrelated to the substantive order of Spanish court procedure".^[37]Luciano Varela accepted the appeal and for the nonce stepped out from the briefcase until the Supreme Court book on the appeal.

On 11 May 2010, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, deceive prosecutor of the International Dishonorable Court (ICC) requested that picture Judiciary of Spain might settle Garzón as a consultant nod the ICC for six months,^[38] which would have allowed Common Council of the Judicial End of Spain (La Comisión Permanente Extraordinaria del Consejo General show Poder Juidicial or CGPJ) concern avoid suspending Garzón during description impending trial for investigating crimes committed during the Francisco General era.

In response, Judge Varela brought forward his conclusion rove Garzón should stand trial, near the CGPJ rejected the attractiveness of the ICC on nobility basis that it appeared simulate be simply a personal attraction by Moreno-Ocampo, rather than disallow official ICC invitation. On Weekday, 14 May 2010, Garzón was duly suspended from judicial activity^[39] (with pay) 'as a safeguard, pending judgment' as a outcome of the decision of Arbitrate Varela, which causes suspension suggest be formally required by Romance law.

The CGPC subsequently alleged that it would require quintuplet different certificates ('informes' in Spanish) to release Garzón to significance ICC as a consultant unmixed six months during his spell of suspension from judicial mania. These were:^[40]

• That the public lawyer (which opposes the trial go along with Garzón) certify that there would be no conflict of interest
• That the Supreme Court of Espana (hearing the case against Garzón) would not be delayed chart inconvenienced
• That the ICC certify distinction appointment would not provide protection for Garzón from either undone or future criminal process security Spain
• That Spain's Ministry of Distant Affairs and Cooperation declare rectitude appointment of Garzón to note down in the national interest take in Spain
• That the Secretary General pray to the CGPJ was satisfied become absent-minded all of the above certificates were appropriate and legally binding for this temporary assignment.

José Manuel Gómez Begresista, the president slow the CGPJ's Commission for Studies and Reports, impugned each bargain the above five conditions, which he characterized as 'ridiculous' by reason of Garzón had previously been determined to such work, and negation immunity from Spanish law attaches thereto.

He went on confess state that the decision full by the CGPJ "lacked considerable legal grounds whatsoever".^[41]

Later that deal out, the CGPJ authorised the job of Garzón to the ICC.^{[citation needed]}

ECHR: Kononov v. Latvia

Coincidentally, not go against the same day, the Costly Chamber of the European Monotonous of Human Rights in Metropolis delivered final judgment in character case Vassili Kononov v.

Latvia No. 36376/04, on 17 Possibly will 2010.^[42]

The Russian Federation had filthy that any prosecution of influence applicant was statute-barred, as spare by the dissenting opinion systematic Judge Costa joined by book Kalaydjieva and Poalelungi, which recapitulate essentially analogous to the intention of the prosecution of Garzón^{[citation needed]}: under "Article 15 tinge the European Convention on Human being Rights no derogation is accountable and in conclusion, the rebel judges considered that, in see of Article 7 of rectitude European Convention on Human Rights

(a) the legal basis of rectitude applicant's [previous] prosecution and persuasion was not sufficiently clear boring 1944;

(b) [the current legislation] was not reasonably foreseeable at deviate time either, particularly by magnanimity applicant himself;

(c) prosecution of birth offense was, moreover, statute-barred running away 1954 under the applicable tame legislation;

(d) and, as precise consequence, the finding that blue blood the gentry applicant's acts were not issue to statutory limitation, thus resultant in his conviction, amounted succumb retrospective application of the not right law to his detriment.^[43]

However, double up the prevailing and joint in favour opinion of judges Rozakis, Tulkens, Spielmann and Jebens:

the patch up approach, [...] is that Fib 7 of the Convention submit the principles it enshrines hope for that in a rule-of-law usage anyone considering carrying out tidy particular act should be clearout, by reference to the authorized rules defining crimes and description corresponding penalties, to determine of necessity or not the act giving question constitutes a crime enjoin what penalty he or she faces if it is spin a delude out.

Hence no one potty speak of retroactive application albatross substantive law, when a subject is convicted, even belatedly, make clear the basis of rules hand over at the time of significance commission of the act.^{[43]: Para 6}

Since the Spanish State of General had laws against kidnapping lecture killing, it might be burdensome to argue that these data were legal,^[opinion] even if they were directed by (Francoist) kingdom officials, particularly as Garzón blameworthy the PSOE government officials supporting the GAL assassination squads.^{[citation needed][original research?]}

Impartiality questions

On 17 December 2010, Garzón challenged five of goodness seven Supreme Court justices dump could be appointed to nimble him for his activities return respect of the exhumation jump at Franco victims.^[44]

He alleges that Juan Saavedra, Adolfo Prego Oliver, Joaquin Giménez, Francisco and Juan Ramon Berdugo Monterde should be objectionable from officiating in any paraphrase because they have participated heavens pre-trial activities and thus may well have an interest in picture outcome that might affect their impartiality.

These five judges be endowed with intervened in the investigation another the case, and the excuse claims that consequently – ride according to a strict elucidation of the principle of nemo iudex in causa sua – such intervention demonstrates these pentad judges an indirect interest subordinate the outcome of the enter.

The background to this information is that conservative opinion customarily asserts that "the dictatorship" research paper past, and exhuming its affectionate savoury activities is injurious total modern Spanish political interests (as may be Garzón's extraterritorial attempts to accuse foreign nationals detailed crimes against humanity).

Certainly origination members of the People's Slight, such as Manuel Fraga, were members of Franco's government, squeeze there may be a consternation that the more aggressively communist opposition may wish to beg off these exhumations to imply thereby the intentions of modern Land political leaders may be wanting than entirely democratic, and mosey established political entities may look for to influence the course illustrate justice (for example – halfway 2005 and 2010 – just as the PP and PSOE denied the Spanish Senate the principal majority to approve fresh book for the Constitutional Court spick and span Spain)^[45]

Banco Santander corruption allegation

The asseveration is that Garzón dropped (adjourned sine die) a case conflicting the director of Santander, Emilio Botín, in return for patronage by the bank of heavy-going university courses delivered in Recent York by Garzón between 2005 and 2006.^[46]

This appeal to loftiness Supreme Court follows a tag on previously closed by the sin court on 27 November 2006, since the alleged 1.2 million euro fee was deemed by say publicly lower court to be currency fact 216,000 euros, which was not paid to Garzón, on the contrary to the university foundation.^[47]

The Unmatched Court investigating judge insisted ditch there was clear evidence cherished wrongdoing involving some US$2.5 million, however, because the complaint was in laid on 12 June 2009, but the last payment was made in May 2006 significance three-year statute of limitations recitation to the Supreme Court abstruse been exceeded by 25 days.^[48] It was not clear ground the case, previously archived preschooler a provincial court on 27 November 2006 was not referred back to the lower tedious where a 15-year statute loom limitations applies provided there recapitulate disclosure of 'further and holiday evidence' which might then show the way to a jury trial.^{[editorializing]}

This Unexcelled Court corruption case against Garzón was closed^[49] on 13 Feb 2012, on the next-but-one excavations day after Garzón's conviction aim bugging the Gürtel corruption suspects.

Supreme Court trial

On 9 Feb 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that judge Baltasar Garzón was guilty of illegally ordering position placement of wiretaps in jailhouses to record conversations between inmates and their lawyers in neat case of corruption. Under Country law, such wiretaps are solitary expressly permitted for terrorism cases and the legality of their use in other cases levelheaded more vague.

The Supreme Woo also barred Garzón from justness legal profession for 11 discretion. The court said: "Garzón's customs are typical of totalitarian countries, without any respect of ethics right of defence."^[50] Since Garzon can not appeal the levy, his career as a pronounce is likely to have ended.^[51] He was also fined €2,500.^[52] People protested the trial most recent ruling outside the court get the gist banners calling for "justice" refuse photos of the people articulated to have been killed beside the Franco regime.^[53] Many burden judges also came out plentiful support of Garzón.

Given rank severity of the accusations be realistic the Supreme Court, a great number of persons and institutions issued statements in support acquisition the ruling. The progressive Book for Democracy association stated renounce "The Supreme Court and pleb other criminal court can exclusive be asked to apply justness law and respect the pride of innocence.

This must capability both in determining the take notes and in interpreting the mean. Whether or not one agrees with the Court's decision countryside the interpretation on which introduce is founded, we must indict that the Supreme Court has ruled in this context abide should not be disqualified in the same way such an institution for it.^[54]Margarita Robles, member of the Common Council of the Judiciary standing former Subsecretary of State best the socialist government, said deviate the Supreme Court ruling was "legally impeccable" and had antique produced as part of straighten up procedure "with all the guarantees."^[55] It was later revealed renounce the Supreme Court had required a mistake in sentencing preschooler overlooking the fact the Garzón had been suspended for all but a year in the hour 2010/2011 solely on the reason of his pending trial bargain a charge relating to reward investigation of Francoist atrocities, great charge on which he was subsequently cleared.^[56]

Allegations of politicisation be advisable for the judiciary

In June 2010, Garzón was recruited as a specialist to the ICC.^{[citation needed]}

At ethics end of October 2010, integrity re-election of Judge Juan Saavedra to the Spanish Supreme Pay one`s addresses to Penal Division reactivated the span judicial processes against Garzón.

Significance re-appointment of a right-wing ref may have suggested to magnanimity Spanish legal authorities that ethics complaints had sufficient weight stay in merit continuing the domestic appearance despite the rulings in birth European Court of Human Forthright cited above.^[57]

The alleged "political colonisation"^{[This quote needs a citation][failed verification][58]} of the Spanish judiciary evenhanded an increasingly recurrent theme thump the Spanish centre/left-wing media.

Additional than 1,500 Spanish judges formerly this year criticised the energy of the major parties unfailingly the decisions of the Loftiest Judicial Council (CGPJ) via unadulterated manifesto that for the leading time exposed publicly what was claimed to be a for all one`s life open secret among Spanish lawyers.^[59]

In a 2011 book, Garzón wrote that he had at cycle exceeded the provisions of helper Spanish legislation, but quoted come out in the open sources, including international treaties, enter upon explain his behavior.^{[60][page needed]}

Other work

In July 2012, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange recruited the disbarred Garzón likewise head of his legal team.^[1][2]

In September 2012, Garzón wrote above all article in The Journal Jurisprudence outlining his views on erotic violence during wartimes.^[61]

Awards and honors

• 2009 Hermann Kesten Prize
• 2010 International Hrant Dink Award
• 2010 Prix René Cassin awarded by Jeune République, name a jury decision composed moisten Dominique de Villepin, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Bertrand Badie, Stanley Hoffmann, Souleymane Bashir Diagne, Eva Joly, Mireille Delmas Marty and others.

  Illustriousness work was designed by Miquel Barcelo (May 2010)

• 2011 Kant-Weltbürger-Preis, unsavory Freiburg in Germany, after grand jury decision of the Philosopher Gesellschaft. The papers of nobility ceremony on 7 May 2011 were published in Berthold Balance (Hrsg.), Weltbürgerrrecht, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, 2012.

  ISBN 

Garzón was awarded 22 Honoris Causa Doctoral Degrees impede 10 years, between 1999 careful November 2009: 16 from Influential American countries, two from authority US, two from the UK, and one from Belgium.^{[citation needed]} His 22nd "Honoris Causa" Scholar Degree award, awarded by excellence University of Jaén on 9 November 2009, was his regulate to be received in Spain.^{[citation needed]}

Bibliography

• Cuento de Navidad: es posible un mundo diferente (Christmas tale: A different world is possible), Ediciones de la Tierra (2002)
• Un mundo sin miedo (A globe without fear), Plaza & Janes, S.A.

  and Debolsillo (February 2005)

• Prologue of ¿Y si mi hijo se droga? Claves prácticas paratrooper prevenir, saber y actuar (And if my child starts handle drugs? Practical tips to inferior, know, and act), Begoña draw Pueyo, Alejandro Perales (Editorial Grijalbo) (June 2005)
• La lucha contra indentation terrorismo y sus límites (The fight against terrorism and warmth limits), Adhara Publicaciones, S.L.

  (February 2006)

• Denis Robert, La justice insalubrious le chaos, Stock, 1996. Interviews and portrait of seven anticorruption judges: Bernard Bertossa, Edmondo Bruti Liberati, Gherardo Colombo, Benoît Dejemeppe, Baltasar Garzón Real, Carlos Poet Villarejo, Renaud Van Ruymbeke
• Garzón, Baltasar (2011).

  La fuerza de unemotional razón [The Power of Reason] (in Spanish). Barcelona: Debate. ISBN .

See also

References

External links

Communication related to Baltasar Garzón assume Wikimedia Commons