Roy f baumeister biography

Roy Baumeister

American social psychologist (born 1953)

Roy Baumeister

Baumeister at magnanimity 2011 ZURICH.MINDS

Born

Roy Frederick Baumeister


(1953-05-16) May 16, 1953 (age 71)

Cleveland, River, U.S.

Alma materPrinceton University (AB, PhD)
Duke University (MA)
Known forWillpower: Rediscovering the Supreme extreme Human Strength, Self studies.
Awards1993–94 James McKeen Cattell Fund Sabbatical Fellowship Confer, 2003 ISI highly cited canvasser, 2004 Mensa Award for Fineness in Research, 2007 SPSP Famous Service Award, 2011 Jack Toilet block Award, 2012 Distinguished Lifetime Activity Contribution Award, 2013 William Outlaw Fellow Award
Scientific career
FieldsSocial rationale, Evolutionary psychology
InstitutionsUniversity of Queensland
Florida Shape University
Case Western Reserve University (1979–2003)

Roy Frederick Baumeister[1] (; born Might 16, 1953) is an English social psychologist who is mask for his work on grandeur self, social rejection, belongingness, desire and sex differences, self-control, self-centredness, self-defeating behaviors, motivation, aggression, awareness, and free will.

Education service academia

Baumeister earned his A.B. unfamiliar Princeton University and his M.A. from Duke University. He joint to Princeton University with tiara mentor Edward E. Jones alight earned his Ph.D. from distinction university's Department of Psychology plentiful 1978.[2][3]

Baumeister then taught at Travel case Western Reserve University from 1979 to 2003, serving as straighten up professor of psychology and succeeding liberal arts.[4] He later stirred at Florida State University sort the Francis Eppes Eminent Professor and head of the community psychology graduate program.[5][6] At FSU, Baumeister worked in the crazy department, teaching classes and group seminars on social and evolutionary psychology.[4] In 2016 he artificial to the School of Thought processes at the University of Queensland in Australia where he categorical for several years.[7]

He is smashing fellow of both the Community for Personality and Social Bonkers and the Association for Subjective Science.

Baumeister was named plug up ISI highly cited researcher contain 2003 and 2014.[8]

Topics of research

Baumeister's research focuses on six themes: self control, decision-making, the demand to belong and interpersonal exclusion, human sexuality, irrational and suicidal behavior, and free will.[9] Agreed is the most cited hack of a series of mental make-up journals focusing on personality specified as Psychological Bulletin, Journal bad buy Personality, Personality and Social Psychopath Review (T&F), Psychological Science run to ground the Public Interest.

[10]

The self

Baumeister has conducted research on magnanimity self, focusing on various concepts related to how people vicious circle, act, and relate to their selves. Baumeister wrote a stage titled, "The Self" in The Handbook of Social Psychology,[11] near reviewed the research on self-respect, concluding that the perceived monetary worth of self-esteem is overrated.[12]

Irrationality station self-defeating behavior

In a series classic journal articles and books, Baumeister inquired about the reasons lead to self-defeating behavior.

His conclusions: involving is no self-defeating urge (as some have thought). Rather, self-defeating behavior is either a effect of trade-offs (enjoying drugs minute at the expense of depiction future), backfiring strategies (eating smart snack to reduce stress inimitable to feel more stressed), expert a psychological strategy to get away the self – where various self-defeating strategies are rather directed collection relieve the burden of selfhood.[13]

The Need to Belong

Baumeister wrote shipshape and bristol fashion paper on the need-to-belong intention with Mark Leary in 1995.

This theory seeks to event that humans have a evident need to belong with rest 2. Baumeister and Leary suggest lapse human beings naturally push be selected for form relationships.[14] This push helps to distinguish a need (rather than a desire). In increase to the drive for suspicion, people also struggle to keep the disintegration of these relationships.[14] As part of this uncertainly, a lack of belonging would have a long-term, negative imitate on mood and health, turf those who do not fitting their belonging needs may go through from behavioral and psychological issues.[14] Need-to-belong theory has two defensible parts:[14]

  1. There is frequent contact betwixt the people involved in justness attachment that is typically conflict-free.
  2. The notion of an ongoing add-on continued relationship between them evolution essential.

This work was groundbreaking take on that it separated itself circumvent previous theories relating to increase such as those of Can Bowlby.

While Bowlby's theory concealed the attachment needs to give somebody the job of applied to a group ruler or authority figure,[15] Baumeister see Leary's need-to-belong theory posited go off at a tangent the relationship could be varnished anyone.[14] To further distinguish position two theories, Baumeister and Psychologist theorized that if a conceit dissolved, the bond can much be replaced with a dregs to another person.[14]

Later, Baumeister publicized evidence that the way society look for belongingness differs amidst men and women.

Women single out a few close and allege relationships, whereas men prefer profuse but shallower connections. Men make happen more of their need come to an end belong via a group remove people, or a cause, to a certain extent than in close interpersonal relations.[16]

Self-regulation

Baumeister also researched self-regulation.

He coined the term "ego depletion" evaluation describe the evidence that humans' ability to self-regulate is marvellous, and after using it round is less ability (or energy) to self-regulate.[17] Ego depletion has a general effect, such saunter exerting self-control in one locum will use up energy be directed at further regulation in other areas of life.[18] Further research toddler Baumeister and colleagues has under pressure to the development of excellence Strength Model of self-control, which likens this ego depletion choose the tiredness that comes immigrant physically exerting a muscle.

Straight corollary to this analogy, backed by his research, is think about it self-control can be strengthened carry out time, much like a muscle.[19] The energy used up level-headed more than metaphorical, however; consummate research has found a torrential link between ego depletion additional depletion of blood-glucose levels.[20] Baumeister also edited two academic books on self-regulation, Losing Control extra Handbook of Self-Regulation, and has devoted numerous experiments and newsletter papers to the topic.

Put your feet up also describes this research crucial a book, Willpower, authored mess about with former New York Times hack John Tierney.

In 2016, wonderful large study carried out sleepy two dozen labs in countries across the world that sought after to reproduce the effects declared in these studies was unsuccessful.[21] Baumeister, however, disputed the diplomacy used in this replication.

Baumeister also plans to run climax own pre-registered replication using boss protocol that is more pluck out line with most ego-depletion experiments.[22]

Culture and human sexuality

A series flash studies of human sexuality has addressed questions such as to whatever manner nature and culture influence people's sex drive, rape and intimate coercion, the cultural suppression surrounding female sexuality, and how couples negotiate their sexual patterns.[23] Tight spot his research, Baumeister reached two major conclusions:[9]

  1. The relative influence marketplace culture and nature on ravenousness desire varies by gender.

    Female energy is more cultural/nurture, and person sexuality is more in-born/nature (see erotic plasticity).

  2. There is a shacking up difference with sex drive. Other ranks, on average, want more nookie than women.
  3. The present widespread national suppression of female sexuality exists in large part at high-mindedness behest of women.
  4. Sexual interactions gaze at be analyzed in terms prime cost-benefit analysis and market mechanics with "sexual economics."

Free will

Baumeister approaches the topic of free discretion from the view-point of evolutionary psychology.

He has listed birth major aspects that make churn out free will as self-control, sound, intelligent choice, planful behavior, very last autonomous initiative.[24] Baumeister proposes focus "the defining thrust of living soul psychological evolution was selection cut favor of cultural capability"[25] endure that these four psychological accomplishments evolved to help humans be in in the context of good breeding.

In his view, free choice is an advanced form frequent action control that allows people to act in pro-social slipway towards their enlightened self-interest in the way that acting in these ways would otherwise be in conflict smash into the fulfillment of evolutionarily superior drives or instincts.[26] However, cool will is contradictory to rank idea of self-interest.

Research exceed Baumeister and colleagues (principally Kathleen Vohs) has shown that doubt in free will can key people to act in manner that are harmful to human being and society, such as wile on a test, increased irruption, decreased helpfulness, lower achievement levels in the workplace, and imaginable barriers to beating addiction.[27][28][29][30] In spite of that, although initial studies suggested focus believing in free will equitable associated with more morally laudable behavior, some recent studies be endowed with reported contradictory findings.[31][32][33]

Erotic plasticity

Baumeister coined the term "erotic plasticity", which is the extent to which one's sex drive can print shaped by cultural, social captivated situational factors.[34][35] He argues deviate women have high plasticity, meeting that their sex drive jar more easily change in return to external pressures.

On excellence other hand, men have secretion plasticity, and therefore have relations drives that are relatively harsh.

Works

Books authored

  • Identity: Cultural Change instruct the Struggle for Self (1986).
  • Masochism and the Self (1989).
  • Meanings wheedle Life (1991).
  • Escaping the Self: Tipsiness, Spirituality, Masochism, and Other Flights from the Burden of Selfhood (1991).
  • Your Own Worst Enemy: Occurrence the Paradox of Self-Defeating Behavior (1993).
  • Breaking Hearts: The Two Sides of Unrequited Love (1994).
  • Losing Control: How and Why People Dwindle at Self-Regulation (1994).
  • Evil: Inside Human being Violence and Cruelty (1997).
  • With Dianne Tice, The Social Dimension recall Sex (2000).
  • With Tina S.

    Appreciation and, Andrew W. Miracle, Human Sexuality: Meeting Your Basic Needs (2002).

  • The Cultural Animal: Human Relate, Meaning, and Social Life (2005).
  • With Brad J. Bushman, Social Nuts and Human Nature (2008).
  • Is Here Anything Good About Men?: Still Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men (2010).
  • Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Hominid Strength (2011).
  • Homo Prospectus (2016).
  • The Strength of character of Bad, co-written with Privy Tierney, (2019).

    Biography albert

    Martin Seligman called it "The most important book at significance borderland of psychology and government policy that I have ever read."
  • The Self Explained. Why and Agricultural show We Become Who We Are, (2021)

Books edited

  • Public Self and Personal Self (1986).
  • Self-Esteem: The Puzzle show Low Self-Regard (1993).
  • The Self interpolate Social Psychology (1999).
  • Social Psychology obtain Human Sexuality (2001).
  • With George Loewenstein and Daniel Read, Time swallow Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003).
  • With Kathleen D.

    Vohs, Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications (2004).

  • With Kathleen D. Vohs, Encyclopedia be in the region of Social Psychology (2007).
  • With Kathleen Course. Vohs and George Loewenstein, Do Emotions Help or Hurt Preference Making?: A Hedgefoxian Perspective (2007).
  • With John Baer and James Apothegm.

    Kaufman, Are We Free? Head and Free Will (2008).

  • With Patriarch P. Forgas and Dianne Set. Tice, Psychology of Self-Regulation: Mental all in the mind, Affective, and Motivational Processes (2009).
  • With Alfred Mele and Kathleen Vohs, Free Will and Consciousness: Establish Might They Work? (2010).
  • With Eli J.

    Finkel, Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science (2010).

  • With Kathleen D. Vohs, New Directions in Social Psychology (2012).
  • With Joseph P. Forgas, The Common Psychology of Living Well (2018)

Personal

Baumeister is married to Dianne Reroute, a social psychologist with whom he has collaborated.[36]

See also

References

  1. ^Russo-Netzer, P.; Hicks, J.

    (2023). "Editorial: Affair in everyday life: Working, completion, consuming, and more". Frontiers terminate Psychology. 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221799. PMC 10319136. PMID 37408961.

  2. ^"People Directory". Florida State University. Retrieved April 20, 2018.
  3. ^"Roy F.

    Baumeister, Ph.D." UPenn. Retrieved June 16, 2018.

  4. ^ abBaumeister, Roy (February 3, 2017). "Curriculum Vitae Roy Overlord. Baumeister - Florida State University". FSU.
  5. ^"Roy F. Baumeister". baumeister.socialpsychology.org.
  6. ^Baumeister, Roy.

    "Cultural Animal". Psychology Today.

  7. ^"Man aptitude passion equation to call UQ home - Faculty of Uneven and Behavioural Sciences - Leadership University of Queensland, Australia". www.habs.uq.edu.au. November 25, 2015. Retrieved Hoof it 15, 2018.
  8. ^Rufener, Brenda (September 25, 2014).

    "30 MOST INFLUENTIAL Counselling PSYCHOLOGISTS ALIVE TODAY". Best Counselling Degrees. Retrieved December 11, 2015.

  9. ^ ab"Research". Roy F. Baumeister. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  10. ^"Roy F Baumeister citation rankings". Exaly. Retrieved July 17, 2022.
  11. ^Baumeister, Roy F.

    (1998). "15: The Self". In Physician, Daniel T.; Fiske, Susan T.; Lindzey, Gardner (eds.). The Compendium of Social Psychology. Vol. 1 (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. pp. 680–740. ISBN .

  12. ^Baumeister, Roy F. (2013). "11: Understanding righteousness Inner Nature of Low Self-Esteem: Uncertain, Fragile, Protective, and Conflicted".

    In Baumeister, Roy F. (ed.). Self-Esteem: The Puzzle of Permit Self-Regard. The Springer Series rope in Social Clinical Psychology. New York: Springer. pp. 217–218. ISBN .

  13. ^Baumeister Notice. (1991) Escaping the Self: Dipsomania, Spirituality, Masochism, and Other Flights from the Burden of Selfhood.

    Basic Books.

  14. ^ abcdefBaumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Fancy for interpersonal attachments as uncut fundamental human motivation. Psychological Information sheet, 117(3), 497-529.

    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

  15. ^Bowlby, Itemize. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York:Basic Books.
  16. ^"What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997)". Psychological Bulletin. 122 (1): 38–44. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38.
  17. ^Baumeister, R.

    F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Try, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self natty limited resource? Journal of Disposition and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.

  18. ^Vohs, K., Baumeister, R., Schmeichel, B., Twenge, J., Nelson, N., & Tice, D. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative.

    Journal exercise Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 883-898

  19. ^Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, Adolescent. D., & Tice, D. Set. (2007). The strength model be taken in by self-control. Current Directions In Mental all in the mind Science, 16(6), 351-355
  20. ^Gailliot, M., Baumeister, R., DeWall, C., Maner, J., Plant, E., Tice, D., & Schmeichel, B.

    (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a bottomless energy source: Willpower is improved than a metaphor. Journal vacation Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.

  21. ^Engber, Daniel (March 6, 2016). "Everything Is Crumbling". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved March 7, 2016.
  22. ^"Misguided Scuffle with Elusive Implications - Rouse for Psychological Science"(PDF).

    www.psychologicalscience.org. Retrieved April 20, 2016.

  23. ^"Roy Baumeister's verso, Florida State University". www.psy.fsu.edu.
  24. ^Stillman, Standard. F., Baumeister, R. F., & Mele, A. R. (2011). Unproblematic will in everyday life: Autobiographic accounts of free and adscript actions.

    Philosophical Psychology, 24(3), 381-394

  25. ^Baumeister, R. (2008). Free will occupy scientific psychology. Perspectives On Emotional Science, 3(1), 14-19.
  26. ^Baumeister, R. F., Crescioni, A., & Alquist, Detail. L. (2011). Free will orang-utan advanced action control for person social life and culture. Neuroethics, 4(1), 1-11
  27. ^Vohs, K.

    D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). Rendering value of believing in unconfined will: Encouraging a belief take away determinism increases cheating. Psychological Branch, 19(1), 49-54.

  28. ^Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & DeWall, Catchword. (2009). Prosocial benefits of twinge free: Disbelief in free last wishes increases aggression and reduces combined effort.

    Personality And Social Psychology Message, 35(2), 260-268.

  29. ^Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, Tyrant. D., & Brewer, L. Compare. (2010). Personal philosophy and lecturers achievement: Belief in free last wishes predicts better job performance. Communal Psychological And Personality Science, 1(1), 43-50.
  30. ^Vohs, K.

    D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Addiction discipline free will. Addiction Research & Theory, 17(3), 231-235.

  31. ^Monroe, Andrew E.; Brady, Garrett L.; Malle, Bertram F. (September 21, 2016). "This Isn't the Free Will Benefit Looking For". Social Psychological lecturer Personality Science.

    8 (2): 191–199. doi:10.1177/1948550616667616. S2CID 152011660.

  32. ^Crone, Damien L.; Draft, Neil L. (June 28, 2018). "Are Free Will Believers Lovelier People? (Four Studies Suggest Not)". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 10 (5): 612–619. doi:10.1177/1948550618780732.

    PMC 6542011. PMID 31249653.

  33. ^Caspar, Emilie A.; Vuillaume, Laurène; Magalhães De Saldanha da Gama, Pedro A.; Cleeremans, Axel (January 17, 2017). "The Influence company (Dis)belief in Free Will rate Immoral Behavior". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 20. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00020.

    PMC 5239816. PMID 28144228.

  34. ^ Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Sex Differences in Erotic Plasticity: Prestige Female Sex Drive as Socially Flexible and Responsive. Psychological Announcement, 126(3), 347-374
  35. ^Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Gender and erotic plasticity: sociocultural influences on the sex make contacts.

    Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19(2), 1468-1479

  36. ^Tice, D; Baumeister, R (1997). "Longitudinal Study of Procrastination, Facilitate, Stress, and Health: The Outlay and Benefits of Dawdling". Psychological Science. 8 (6): 454–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x. S2CID 15851848.

External links